data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b85dc/b85dc269e18d599462dbb8b167ad4a79eecae74f" alt="Gpu compare intel"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de873/de8731a8d1a4c96a4371e16dbeb3ea6bc7775dd7" alt="gpu compare intel gpu compare intel"
Four and a half years for 200 MHz is a pathetic improvement, especially given in that time Intel has found a way to increase CPU cores from two to six.īut it gets worse.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d30b/3d30b016859c7ba9412d164dfa9d486f1e5b4366" alt="gpu compare intel gpu compare intel"
Intel U-series CPUs from 2013 to 2019įrom 2015's Broadwell to Comet Lake in 2019, the only improvement Intel has given to their 15W-class GPU is a clock speed increase of 200 MHz. The Whiskey Lake Core i7-8565U to cite an example, has that part clocked at 1150 MHz. All use some variant of Intel's HD or UHD 620 GPU, which you guessed it, still pack 24 execution units. Then we move through Kaby Lake, Kaby Lake Refresh, Whiskey Lake and now Comet Lake. The following year we got Skylake with HD Graphics 520, a 100 MHz bump of the same 24 execution unit design. That launched with Intel's HD Graphics 5500, a GT2 tier GPU with 24 execution units and a maximum clock speed of 950 MHz.
GPU COMPARE INTEL SERIES
Since the launch of Broadwell, Intel's first series of 14nm CPUs back in 2014, Intel has been using the same basic GPU design for all 14nm products, right through to current 10th-gen Comet Lake products. Why is this, and why so slow for so long? This stems from the hardware they've been using for the past five years. those sorts of games should be playable on modern integrated graphics in an ideal world.īut as we know, for years Intel's integrated GPUs haven't been powerful enough to run popular titles like Fortnite or even CS:Go at reasonable but the lowest settings. Probably not Red Dead Redemption 2 kind of gameplay, but more your Fortnites and Overwatches. Most ultraportables that use 15 or 25 watt CPUs aren't exactly designed for gaming or have gaming in mind - that's what your bigger 15-inch devices are for - but buyers of ultraportables still might be interested in a bit of casual gaming. Today, of course, we plan to switch gears to take a look at gaming performance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bdc/26bdcb01f6a88021b5fe1153df57c99d7d4b44c4" alt="gpu compare intel gpu compare intel"
But as far as a single-chip solution goes, Ice Lake is quite decent. Third, it doesn't greatly improve what's been available in ultraportable form factors because you can also find discrete GPUs in 13-inch thin and light systems. While we haven't covered gaming yet, the new Gen11 GPU design has brought significant gains to GPU-limited and compute-heavy productivity apps, and makes Ice Lake a great choice for some workloads like Adobe Premiere. Second, the Core i7-1065G7 does bring higher single-threaded performance, and crucially for today's review, improved GPU performance. From both a performance and efficiency standpoint, in this regard 10nm is a bit of a disappointment.
GPU COMPARE INTEL UPGRADE
First, a few takeaways from our initial review: as far as multi-threaded applications go, Ice Lake on 10nm isn't offering an upgrade over existing quad-core 14nm Skylake derivates like Comet Lake or Whiskey Lake.
GPU COMPARE INTEL PLUS
After exploring the capabilities of the new Ice Lake Core i7-1065G7 on the productivity side, we're coming back to test the CPU for ultrabook gaming using the G11 Iris Plus integrated graphics.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b85dc/b85dc269e18d599462dbb8b167ad4a79eecae74f" alt="Gpu compare intel"